The Impact of Sanctions on the Energy Sector: A General Overview Through the Lukoil Case

3/26/2026

All Insights
One of the notable recent developments in global energy markets is the divestment process of international assets by the Russian oil company Lukoil. Exceeding USD 20 billion in value, this process represents not only a corporate asset sale but also a significant example of how sanctions are shaping the energy sector.
At the core of this process are the U.S. sanctions imposed in October 2025. Under these sanctions, Lukoil has entered into a divestment process for certain international operations, subject to the licensing framework of the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). However, such transactions are not merely commercial decisions; they are also subject to extensive regulatory approval processes. In particular, licenses issued by OFAC directly determine whether and how the process may proceed.

Under the current general license issued by OFAC, parties are permitted to conduct negotiations and preparatory steps for potential transactions until 1 April 2026, a deadline which may be extended again, as has been the case previously. However, the completion of any final sale transactions remains subject to separate, specific authorization from OFAC.

At the same time, a portfolio of this scale has attracted significant investor interest. International energy companies and private equity funds have expressed interest in acquiring parts of the assets. Nevertheless, the final structure of the transactions, including which assets will be sold, to whom, and under what structure, remains uncertain. This is primarily due to the requirement to obtain approvals from regulatory authorities across multiple jurisdictions.

Another factor complicating the process is the situation surrounding the West Qurna-2 oilfield in Iraq. The nationalization of Lukoil’s interest in this field by the Iraqi government has directly affected both the scope of the portfolio and investor interest. While preliminary considerations have been made regarding the future operatorship of the field, no final decisions have yet been taken.

In addition, pre-emption rights held by certain states over assets located within their territories may further limit the scope of the portfolio available for sale. In practice, this means that some assets may be acquired by host states before being offered to the broader market.

Furthermore, volatility in global oil prices, driven by ongoing geopolitical developments in the Middle East, continues to impact both asset valuations and the overall divestment process.

In conclusion, the Lukoil case demonstrates that sanctions-driven divestments are no longer purely commercial transactions. Instead, they have become highly complex, multi-layered processes shaped simultaneously by international sanctions regimes, regulatory approvals across multiple jurisdictions, geopolitical dynamics, and market conditions. As a result, timing, structuring, and counterparty selection have become more critical than ever in such transactions.
Related Expertises
Similar Insights
The global economy is once again entering a period of heightened uncertainty. With the return of U.S. President Donald John Trump administration, a new wave of executive orders—most notably around tariffs—has triggered a fundamental recalibration of U.S. domestic and foreign policy.
One of the primary reasons for preferring arbitration is the enforceability of arbitral awards, which are generally supported by many countries that are parties to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the “Convention”). However, since the Convention mainly addresses the enforcement of final awards, the enforcement of interim measures issued by arbitrators remains a more contentious issue. Indeed, Türkiye is also among the jurisdictions where there are challenges and uncertainties regarding the enforcement of interim measures.
Dual-use items, which include goods, software, and technology applicable for both civilian and military purposes, present a complex challenge in today's volatile global landscape, requiring careful regulation and control. The content elaborates on the international efforts, particularly the Wassenaar Arrangement and national practices, to manage these risks, while also discussing the specific stance and legal framework of Turkey in combating the unintended consequences of such dual-use items..
The 2023 Merger and Acquisition Outlook Report (the “Report”), prepared by the Economic Analysis and Research Department of the Competition Authority (the “Authority"), was published on January 5, 2024, on the Authority's website.
As most people are aware of, on February 24, 2022, the Russian Federation (“Russia”) launched a large-scale air and ground military operation against Ukraine with the support of Donetsk (“DNR”) and the Luhansk People’s Republics (“LNR”) in the Donbas region.
Foreigners intending to stay in Turkey for more than the visa or visa exemption period or more than 90 days should obtain a residence permit. In relation to this matter, first of all, we would like to briefly indicate the points to be considered when obtaining a residence permit in Turkey.
The Turkish Competition Authority (the "Authority") had abolished the Communiqué No. 1997/1 Concerning the Mergers and Acquisitions Calling for the Authorization of the Competition Board by the Communiqué No.
2021 has been a ground-breaking year in terms of Turkish Competition Law due toimprovements in various aspects. Compared to the recent developments of the last 10 years, in2021, Turkish Competition Law practice has gained serious momentum only in one year, throughvarious Turkish Competition Board (“Board”) precedents and statutory amendments.
The popularity in use of a non-fungible token (“NFT”) to combine blockchain technology and creative intellectual property is increasing gradually.
In commercial life, the undertakings' ability to carry out their activities freely without being under pressure, is important in terms of maintaining its presence in the market where the undertakings are operating, as well as the consumer's, who are the end buyers, ability to be able to benefit from the final product put on the market at fair pricing and with quality product balance.
With the Coronavirus (“Covid-19”), which has been in our lives since December 2019, the lifestyle with masks and social distance has become the new normal.
Cryptocurrency trade has become a highly preferred investment type in recent years and the popularity of the said investment has considerably increased in Turkey as well. As it is known, since cryptocurrency is not a material type of fiat money and cannot be claimed ownership by any state or organization, its status and conformity to the law remained in a questionable dimension.
Turkey-specific information concerning the key legal issues that need to be considered when drafting and enforcing governing law and jurisdiction clauses.
Turkey-specific information concerning the key legal issues that need to be considered when mediating a dispute.
While Coronavirus (“Covid-19”) is still affecting the world essentially, retail industry, as one of the most deeply affected fields in the commercial world by the reflections of the pandemic, should also be careful to pass their plans through the legal filter, in order to protect the health of employees, to satisfy customers and to get over this Covid-19 period with the least possible losses.
In line with the 15th Action Report within the scope of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project (the “BEPS Project”) conducted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (the “OECD”), the Multilateral Convention to Implement Tax Treaty Related Measures to Prevent Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (the "Convention"), stipulating amendments to the double taxation agreements has been signed by 68 countries including Turkey on 7 June 2017.
Retail sector comes first among the sectors most affected by the COVID-19 outbreak (“Coronavirus”) around the whole world along with our country and causes disruptions in functioning and sustainability of certain sectors such as retail, logistics, health, automotive, and textile.
Per article 367 of the Turkish Commercial Code No. 6102 (“TCC”), boards of directors of joint stock companies may transfer some authority related to the management of the company to some members of the board of directors or to third parties who are not members of the board of directors with an internal directive that it will prepare and put into effect.
After having been approved on 11.01.2011, the Turkish Code of Obligations (the “TCO”) numbered 6098 was published on the Official Gazette dated 04.02.2011 and numbered 27836. In accordance with the Article 648, the TCO entered into force as of the date of 01.07.2012.